From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 28, 1929
168 N.E. 407 (N.Y. 1929)

Opinion

Argued May 1, 1929

Decided May 28, 1929

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Ralph Stout and Thomas S. Colombo for appellant.

Bertrand L. Pettigrew for respondent.


The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of McNamara v. Leipzig ( 227 N.Y. 291) ; Matter of Schweitzer v. Thompson Norris Co. ( 229 N.Y. 97) ; Braxton v. Mendelson ( 233 N.Y. 122); Charles v. Barrett ( 233 N.Y. 127) ; Meade v. Motor Haulage Co., Inc. ( 233 N.Y. 527); Cattini v. American Railway Express Co. ( 234 N.Y. 585); Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contracting Co., Inc. ( 245 N.Y. 66).

CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 28, 1929
168 N.E. 407 (N.Y. 1929)
Case details for

McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company

Case Details

Full title:HELEN McLAUGHLIN, an Infant, by JOHN J. McLAUGHLIN, Her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 28, 1929

Citations

168 N.E. 407 (N.Y. 1929)
168 N.E. 407

Citing Cases

Martucci v. Eskay Coal Fuel Corporation

The verdict is against the weight of the evidence on the issues of negligence. The defendant Eskay Coal Fuel…

Irwin v. Klein

Thus in the absence of proof that a lessor of an automobile has surrendered to the lessee complete control…