From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKnight v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Nov 29, 2023
373 So. 3d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

No. 1D2022-2472

11-29-2023

Darryl Edward MCKNIGHT Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant challenges the imposition of costs on appeal. We affirm the imposition of costs of prosecution without further comment. See Parks v. State, 371 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023). As to Appellant’s claim that the State failed to request the FDLE costs that were imposed, the record shows otherwise. To the extent Appellant argues that there was not sufficient evidence to support imposition of the FDLE costs, this issue was not preserved for appeal. See Mapp v. State, 71 So. 3d 776 (Fla. 2011) (holding that a claim that insufficient evidence was presented to support the order for restitution was not preserved for appeal by filing 3.800(b) motion).

Affirmed.

Roberts, Ray, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McKnight v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Nov 29, 2023
373 So. 3d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

McKnight v. State

Case Details

Full title:Darryl Edward McKnight Jr., Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Nov 29, 2023

Citations

373 So. 3d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)