From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mckinney v. May

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 13, 2011
No. 09-10-00482-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. 09-10-00482-CV

Opinion Delivered January 13, 2011.

On Appeal from the 88th District Court, Hardin County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 50877.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On November 22, 2010, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. Appellant did not respond to the notice.

Appellant did not pay the filing fee for the appeal. Appellant neither filed an affidavit of indigence on appeal nor asserted that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the appellant's failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal after notice and opportunity to cure, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Mckinney v. May

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 13, 2011
No. 09-10-00482-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Mckinney v. May

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD WADE MCKINNEY, Appellant v. ROBERT L. MAY, et al., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jan 13, 2011

Citations

No. 09-10-00482-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2011)

Citing Cases

Cotton Co-op. Ass'n v. Hemphill

I. An action of replevin does not lie under the facts of this case. Doty v. Heth, 52 Miss. 530; Holton v.…