From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenzie v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
Mar 17, 2016
Civil Action No. 14-320 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 17, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-320

03-17-2016

JUSTIN MCKENZIE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN WETZEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE

The Court, having considered the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter, and the balance of record, HEREBY ORDERS:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Docket No. 11, is GRANTED.

(3) The Court sua sponte dismisses Plaintiff's claims against unnamed Defendants John Doe and Jane Doe pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

(4) This case is CLOSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 17th day of March, 2016.

/s/_________

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McKenzie v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
Mar 17, 2016
Civil Action No. 14-320 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 17, 2016)
Case details for

McKenzie v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN MCKENZIE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN WETZEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE

Date published: Mar 17, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-320 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 17, 2016)

Citing Cases

R.B. v. Hollibaugh

The parties instead contest whether Bard's decision to "wait[ ] several hours" before summoning medical…