From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenzie v. Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 2007
38 A.D.3d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-03505.

March 27, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered March 10, 2006, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Anthony J. Scarcella Associates, P.C., White Plains, N.Y. (M. Sean Duffy of counsel), for appellant.

Nesci Keane Piekarski Keogh Corrigan, White Plains, N.Y. (Jason M. Bernheimer of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

While attempting to disembark a bus owned and operated by the defendants, the plaintiff slipped on a step which she described as wet and slushy, and fell from the bus. It is undisputed that a heavy snow had fallen several days earlier and that passengers were tracking snow, slush, and water from the ground onto the bus. After the plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by her in the accident, the defendants moved for summary judgment, claiming, inter alia, that the accident was not the result of any breach of a duty on their part.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment ( see Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067). The evidence submitted by the defendants, including the plaintiff's deposition testimony and that of the bus driver, established that the defendants did not breach a duty owed to the plaintiff since, under the weather conditions which existed at the time of the accident, "[i]t would be unreasonable to expect the defendant[s] to constantly clean the floor[s] of [their] buses" ( Spooner v New York City Tr. Auth., 298 AD2d 575, 575-576; see Hussein v New York City Tr. Auth., 266 AD2d 146, 146-147). The evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Indig v Finkelstein, 23 NY2d 728, 729).


Summaries of

McKenzie v. Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 2007
38 A.D.3d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

McKenzie v. Westchester

Case Details

Full title:HELENA MCKENZIE, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 27, 2007

Citations

38 A.D.3d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2719
835 N.Y.S.2d 213

Citing Cases

Mekhuri v. City of New York

Counsel contends that the mere fact that the floor of the bus was wet during an ongoing storm did not…

Beth v. New York

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment…