From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenzie v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 12, 2004
146 S.W.3d 892 (Ark. 2004)

Opinion

CR 03-775

Opinion delivered February 12, 2004

APPEAL ERROR — COUNSEL DENIED THAT HE SHOULD BE HELD IN CONTEMPT — SPECIAL MASTER APPOINTED. — Where counsel for appellant, in appearing at the show cause hearing, denied that he should be held in contempt for noncompliance with the supreme court's orders, the court appointed a special master to conduct a hearing on the matter.

Special Master appointed.

Charles E. Waldman, for appellant.

No response.


The procedural background of this matter is set out in McKenzie v. State, 355 Ark. 259, 134 S.W.3d. 5 (2003) ( per curiam). Mr. Charles E. Waldman appeared before this court on January 15, 2004, to show cause why he should not be held in civil contempt for failing to comply with the terms of our previous per curiam orders. Mr. Waldman, represented by Mr. Jeff Rosenzweig, denied that he should be held in contempt for noncompliance with our orders. [1] Given the circumstances of this case, we hereby appoint a special master, The Honorable John Cole, to conduct a hearing on the matter. Upon receipt of the master's findings, we will render a decision on the matter.


Summaries of

McKenzie v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 12, 2004
146 S.W.3d 892 (Ark. 2004)
Case details for

McKenzie v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kevin McKENZIE a/k/a Keith Barrett v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 12, 2004

Citations

146 S.W.3d 892 (Ark. 2004)
146 S.W.3d 892

Citing Cases

Valenzuela v. State

The State's motion to dismiss claimed certain jurisdictional grounds had not yet been addressed in this case.…

Valenzuela v. State

At that time, he denied that contempt sanctions were appropriate, and a special master, Judge John Cole, was…