From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenney v. Rubashkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
May 25, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-169-GZS (D. Me. May. 25, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-169-GZS

05-25-2016

ROBERT MCKENNEY, Plaintiff, v. PAUL RUBASHKIN, et al., Defendant


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 20) filed April 26, 2016, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED on Plaintiff's federal claims and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff's federal claims.

2. Plaintiff's state claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

/s/ George Z. Singal

United States District Judge Dated this 25th day of May, 2016.


Summaries of

McKenney v. Rubashkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
May 25, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-169-GZS (D. Me. May. 25, 2016)
Case details for

McKenney v. Rubashkin

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MCKENNEY, Plaintiff, v. PAUL RUBASHKIN, et al., Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: May 25, 2016

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-169-GZS (D. Me. May. 25, 2016)

Citing Cases

Stile v. Somerset Cnty.

In the past, this Court has reviewed corrections officers' affidavits outlining corrections facilities'…