From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGrath v. Blumenthal, Rosenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

May, 1927.


Order vacating examination of defendant Rudolph Blumenthal before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The fact, if it be a fact, that plaintiff already has knowledge of the matters sought to be elicited by the examination of said defendant is no reason for refusing the examination. ( Istok v. Senderling, 118 App. Div. 162; Terry v. Ross Heater Mfg. Co., 180 id. 714; Pierce v. Morris, 192 id. 502; Richards v. Whiting, 127 id. 208.) Kelly, P.J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McGrath v. Blumenthal, Rosenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

McGrath v. Blumenthal, Rosenbaum

Case Details

Full title:DAVID T. McGRATH, Appellant, v. RUDOLPH BLUMENTHAL and ALEXANDER H…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1927

Citations

220 App. Div. 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Wertheim v. Grombecker

( Eagle-Picher Lead Co. v. Mansfield Paint Co., Inc., 201 App. Div. 223; Marine Trust Co. v. Nuway Devices,…

Tremblay v. Lyon

Doubtless knowledge, in certain instances, is insufficient to bar the right to an examination. ( McGrath v.…