Summary
In McGonegal v. McGonegal, 46 Mich. 66, 8 N.W. 724, where divorce was sought upon ground of "habitual drunkenness," the decree was denied because "the evidence which bears most strongly against defendant is of occurrences which took place several years ago."
Summary of this case from Fish v. FishOpinion
No. 382, 2001
Decided: January 30, 2002
Court Below: Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County File No. CS98-04958 and Petition No. 98-39938.
AFFIRMED.
Unpublished Opinion is below.
MARIE F. MCGONEGAL, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. GERARD M. MCGONEGAL, Respondent Below, Appellee. No. 382, 2001 Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Decided: January 30, 2002
Court Below: Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County File No. CS98-04958 and Petition No. 98-39938.
Before WALSH, HOLLAND, and BERGER, Justices.
Joseph T. Walsh, Justice:
ORDER
This 30th day of January 2002, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal should be affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons set forth in, the decision of the Family Court dated July 10, 2001.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.