From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGillicuddy v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 1990
157 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 30, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.).


It is well settled that summary judgment is a drastic remedy available only when it is clear that, accepting the opponent's allegations as given for purposes of the motion, there are no issues of fact left to be resolved. (Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 N.Y.2d 395.) Issues of fact exist as to the nature of plaintiffs' respective employments, whether a subcontracting relationship was involved, whether either plaintiff was documented to be an employee of defendant-appellant, and whether their employment was such that they were covered by a workers' compensation policy.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.


Summaries of

McGillicuddy v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 1990
157 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

McGillicuddy v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH McGILLICUDDY et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 30, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
550 N.Y.S.2d 643