From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGill v. McGill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 27, 1987
127 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

February 27, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Genesee County, Doyle, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Denman, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant parent contends that it was error for Special Term to deny his motion for summary judgment because the infant plaintiff's complaint alleged only negligent supervision (see, Holodook v. Spencer, 36 N.Y.2d 35). We agree. The infant plaintiff was injured when his father left him alone in codefendants' living room. While unsupervised, the child was attacked and bitten by codefendants' dog, sustaining serious facial lacerations. Because the crux of the parent's culpability was negligent supervision, his motion for summary judgment must be granted (see, Wilson v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 126 A.D.2d 954; Zikely v. Zikely, 98 A.D.2d 815, affd 62 N.Y.2d 907).


Summaries of

McGill v. McGill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 27, 1987
127 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

McGill v. McGill

Case Details

Full title:ADAM McGILL, an Infant, by KATHERYN M. BARIE, His Mother and Natural…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1987

Citations

127 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Pravato v. Pravato

The infant plaintiff was injured when she fell or was thrown from a pony that the defendant, her father, had…