From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGary v. Wainwright

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 3, 1967
375 F.2d 118 (5th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 24096.

April 3, 1967.

Ernest Chico McGary, pro se.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., James G. Mahorner, Asst. Atty. Gen., David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, WISDOM, Circuit Judge, and BREWSTER, District Judge.


After a plenary hearing, the district court denied the appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The allegations were that appellant's plea of guilty was coerced by alleged beatings on three occasions and that he was not represented by counsel at any stage of the proceedings.

The appellant admitted in testimony at the hearing that he entered a plea of not guilty after the alleged beatings. Hence, he was not coerced into pleading guilty. The trial court found that in view of the conflict in testimony, the appellant failed to carry the burden of proving that he was not represented by counsel.

The order of the district court is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

McGary v. Wainwright

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 3, 1967
375 F.2d 118 (5th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

McGary v. Wainwright

Case Details

Full title:Ernest Chico McGARY, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 3, 1967

Citations

375 F.2d 118 (5th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See: McGary v. Wainwright, 375 F.2d 118 (5th cir. 1967); Hamilton v. State, Fla.App.…

Little v. Smith

Petitioner's plea bargaining argument is insufficient to justify habeas corpus relief. He does not contend…