From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFadden v. Gainey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2013
520 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6208

04-30-2013

JOSEPH LEE MCFADDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JERRY GAINEY, Defendant - Appellee.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Lee McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:12-cv-01470-MGL) Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Lee McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Lee McFadden appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McFadden v. Gainey, No. 4:12-cv-01470-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

McFadden v. Gainey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2013
520 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

McFadden v. Gainey

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH LEE MCFADDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JERRY GAINEY, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 30, 2013

Citations

520 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2013)