From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDowell v. Hemphill

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1863
60 N.C. 95 (N.C. 1863)

Opinion

(June Term, 1863.)

The treasurer of the trustees of Davidson College is not a corporation sole; on a bond, therefore, payable to one as such, and his successors, a suit cannot be sustained in the name of a successor.

THIS was an action of debt, tried before Osborne, J., at Fall Term 1860, of McDowell.

The plaintiff declared as successor on a bond, payable "to Thomas. H. Robinson, treasures of the trustees of Davidson College, and his successors," and on the trial below the judge ordered a nonsuit, from which plaintiff appealed.

Dickson for plaintiff.

Merrimon for defendant.


We concur with his Honor in the opinion that the action cannot be maintained in the name of McDowell. In Ferebee v. Saunders, 25 N.C. 360, it was decided that "bond taken by a clerk and master in pursuance of an order of the court, and made payable to him and his successors in office, must, on his death, be sued upon in the name of his personal representatives, there being no act of the Legislature requiring bonds to be made payable to him and his successors in office."

That case is decisive of the present action, and we suppose the attention of the counsel who issued the writ was not called to it. "The treasurer of the trustees of Davidson College" is not a corporation sole, and cannot be made so, except by an act of the Legislature. If there be any clause in the charter of the college having that effect, it should have been offered in evidence to the court. As the bond is payable to Thomas H. Robinson, the suit on it must be in his name, if he is living, or in that of his personal representatives, if he is dead.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

(97)


Summaries of

McDowell v. Hemphill

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1863
60 N.C. 95 (N.C. 1863)
Case details for

McDowell v. Hemphill

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT J. McDOWELL, TREASURER v. ANDREW HEMPHILL ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1863

Citations

60 N.C. 95 (N.C. 1863)

Citing Cases

Ringold v. McGowan

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Cited: Graham v. Buchanan, 60 N.C. 95.…

Miller v. Davis

PER CURIAM. Venire de novo. Cited: Hubbard v. Wall, 31 N.C. 22; Graham v. Buchanan, 60 N.C. 95.…