From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDowell v. Eads

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 13, 2020
181 A.D.3d 1179 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

137 CA 19–00400

03-13-2020

Jordan MCDOWELL, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. James EADS, et al., Defendants, and Michael C. Brant, Defendant–Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)

BENNETT SCHECHTER ARCURI & WILL LLP, BUFFALO (PETER D. CANTONE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. HEMMING & STAEHR, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (JONATHAN E. STAEHR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.


BENNETT SCHECHTER ARCURI & WILL LLP, BUFFALO (PETER D. CANTONE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.

HEMMING & STAEHR, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (JONATHAN E. STAEHR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted, and the amended complaint is dismissed against defendant Michael C. Brant.

Same memorandum as in McDowell v. Maldovan ( [appeal No. 1] 181 A.D.3d 1178, 121 N.Y.S.3d 456 [Mar. 13, 2020] [4th Dept 2020] ).


Summaries of

McDowell v. Eads

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 13, 2020
181 A.D.3d 1179 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

McDowell v. Eads

Case Details

Full title:Jordan MCDOWELL, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. James EADS, et al., Defendants…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 13, 2020

Citations

181 A.D.3d 1179 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
118 N.Y.S.3d 473

Citing Cases

Evans v. Annucci

Petitioner failed to raise in his administrative appeal his contention that the Hearing Officer relied on…