From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDougald v. Hous. Cnty. Sheriff's Office

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 14, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO 1:16cv838-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 14, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO 1:16cv838-MHT (WO)

07-14-2017

RUFUS TERRY McDOUGALD, JR., Petitioner, v. HOUSTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The petitioner's objections (doc. no. 21) are overruled.

(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 20) is adopted.

(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 6) is dismissed without prejudice because petitioner has failed to exhaust state remedies.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE, this the 14th day of July, 2017.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McDougald v. Hous. Cnty. Sheriff's Office

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 14, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO 1:16cv838-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 14, 2017)
Case details for

McDougald v. Hous. Cnty. Sheriff's Office

Case Details

Full title:RUFUS TERRY McDOUGALD, JR., Petitioner, v. HOUSTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 14, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO 1:16cv838-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 14, 2017)