From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonald v. Neal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 9, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0128-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Dec. 9, 2013)

Summary

finding the allegations of an officer poking the plaintiff with a nightstick, slapping him two to three times across the face, and shoving him into the wall did not present a physical injury

Summary of this case from Brown v. Mastro

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0128-CG-M

12-09-2013

DAVID McDONALD, AIS # 252206, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER NEAL, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered this date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii), with the damages claims being dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and the injunctive relief claims being dismissed with prejudice as frivolous.

Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McDonald v. Neal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 9, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0128-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Dec. 9, 2013)

finding the allegations of an officer poking the plaintiff with a nightstick, slapping him two to three times across the face, and shoving him into the wall did not present a physical injury

Summary of this case from Brown v. Mastro

finding the allegations of an officer poking the plaintiff with a nightstick, slapping him two to three times across the face, and shoving him into the wall did not present a physical injury

Summary of this case from Smith v. Wester

finding the allegations of an officer poking the plaintiff with a nightstick, slapping him two to three times across the face, and shoving him into the wall did not present a physical injury

Summary of this case from Conrad v. Dunn

finding the allegations of an officer poking the plaintiff with a nightstick, slapping him two to three times across the face, and shoving him into the wall did not present a physical injury

Summary of this case from Riggins v. Myers
Case details for

McDonald v. Neal

Case Details

Full title:DAVID McDONALD, AIS # 252206, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER NEAL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 9, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0128-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Dec. 9, 2013)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Wester

These allegations, even taken as true, do not show that Plaintiff suffered a more than de minimis physical…

Riggins v. Myers

28-1, p. 19-21) See Hollingsworth v. Thomas, 2014 WL 2435763, at *5 (S.D. Ala. May 30, 2014) ("In…