From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDermott v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 29, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-984 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-984

11-29-2016

MARY L. MCDERMOTT, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 22) of Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn, recommending the court deny the appeal of Mary L. McDermott ("McDermott") from the decision of the administrative law judge denying her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits, and it appearing that McDermott did not object to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d at 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court being in agreement with Judge Cohn that the decision of the administrative law judge is "supported by substantial evidence," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fargnoli v. Massanari, 247 F.3d 34, 38 (3d Cir. 2001), and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 22) of Magistrate Judge Cohn is ADOPTED.

2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits of Mary L. McDermott ("McDermott") is AFFIRMED.

3. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and against McDermott as set forth in paragraph 2.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

McDermott v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 29, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-984 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2016)
Case details for

McDermott v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:MARY L. MCDERMOTT, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 29, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-984 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

Dietrich v. Saul

The ALJ's failure to explicitly delineate where obesity may have caused or contributed to specific symptoms…