From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniels v. Preito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Apr 5, 2019
No. 3:17-cv-05801-RBL-DWC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 5, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:17-cv-05801-RBL-DWC

04-05-2019

PETER J MCDANIELS, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN PREITO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David W. Christel, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 47) is granted, and Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice.

(3) Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status will continue on appeal.

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants, and to the Hon. David W. Christel.

DATED this 5th day of April, 2019.

/s/_________

Ronald B. Leighton

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McDaniels v. Preito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Apr 5, 2019
No. 3:17-cv-05801-RBL-DWC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 5, 2019)
Case details for

McDaniels v. Preito

Case Details

Full title:PETER J MCDANIELS, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN PREITO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Apr 5, 2019

Citations

No. 3:17-cv-05801-RBL-DWC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 5, 2019)

Citing Cases

Dragasits v. Rucker

But refusing to sign a search receipt is not protected speech. See McDaniels v. Preito, No.…