From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. Wainwright

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 18, 1968
404 F.2d 352 (5th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 26597.

December 18, 1968.

Walter Lee McDaniel, pro se.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee.

Before RIVES, BELL and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.


The appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal because notice of appeal was not filed for almost nine months after the date of final judgment. No excuse for the delay has been suggested by the appellant.

The district court issued an order purporting to grant a certificate of probable cause and leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Because the notice of appeal was untimely filed, the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter that order, and this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. Rules 4(a), 26(b), F.R.App.P.; Allen v. Wainwright, 384 F.2d 745, (5th Cir. 1967); Kapsalis v. Wilson, 380 F.2d 365 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 878, 88 S.Ct. 180, 19 L.Ed.2d 168 (1967).

The appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.


Summaries of

McDaniel v. Wainwright

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 18, 1968
404 F.2d 352 (5th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

McDaniel v. Wainwright

Case Details

Full title:Walter Lee McDANIEL, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 18, 1968

Citations

404 F.2d 352 (5th Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

Hurt v. Fla. Legislative Body

If the notice is not timely filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to hear the appeal, Pinion v. Dow…

Hurt v. Fla. Legislative Body

If the notice is not timely filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to hear the appeal, Pinion v. Dow…