From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCready v. Villas Apartments

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 13, 1980
379 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 79-661/T4-463.

February 13, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Frederick T. Pfeiffer, J.

Leslie King O'Neal, James W. Markel and Alan F. Scott, Jr., of Graham, Markel, Scott, Marlowe, Appleton McDonough, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Bill McCabe, of Shepherd, McCabe Cooley and Edmund T. Woolfolk, of Walker Buckmaster, Orlando, for appellee.


James McCready appeals from an order which simply reads "The Motion of THE VILLAS APARTMENTS and INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, for Summary Judgment is granted."

The appealability of that order has not been raised. We raise it on our own.

An order simply granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment and is not an order that can be appealed. Pompano Paint Co. v. Pompano Beach Bank and Trust Co., 208 So.2d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); Bailey v. Allstate Insurance Company, 218 So.2d 761 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1969); Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels, Inc., 99 So.2d 719 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1958); Haddad, Partial `Final' Judgments, 53 Fla.B.J. 204 (Oct. 1979). Thus we must dismiss this appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED, sua sponte.

CROSS, J., and McDONALD, PARKER LEE, Associate Judge, concur.

DAUKSCH, C.J., concurs specially with opinion.


While I quite agree with the dismissal of this appeal, I suggest a change in the appellate rules to relax such a formalistic requirement to save the embarrassment and expense, not to mention the judicial labor, incurred in cases such as these. Why can't we say the granting of a motion for summary judgment is just as appealable as the inevitable judgment itself if the order essentially meets the finality requirements? The case law, of course, is quite clear and a rule change is required, if desired.

Since we are acting sua sponte in this matter, I cannot help wonder aloud how one can sue "The Villas Apartments." Is that the curious name of a natural person? I suspect not. It certainly is not a corporation because the word or one of the abbreviated indications is not there. Thus, the only way the appellee could be deemed a form of legal entity is if someone, either a corporation or a natural person, has filed under the Fictitious Name Statute to use the name "The Villas Apartments". In such event, appellant should sue the one who registers the name, not the name.


Summaries of

McCready v. Villas Apartments

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 13, 1980
379 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

McCready v. Villas Apartments

Case Details

Full title:JAMES McCREADY, APPELLANT, v. THE VILLAS APARTMENTS, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 13, 1980

Citations

379 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

State v. Florida Police Benevolent Association

When the trial court on March 5, 1996, ordered the enforcement of the March 14, 1990, order, it was simply…

Servotech v. Atlantic Cent. Corp.

Therefore, the trial judge's denial of defendant's motion for relief from order granting motion for partial…