In McCoy, we acknowledged that a related statute, AS 47.12.300(d), apparently required the pre- sentence investigator to obtain permission from the superior court before using these records.
Summary of this case from Hart v. StateRehearing Denied Oct. 4, 2002.
Opinion on Rehearing Nov. 22, 2002.
Republished at: 80 P.3d 751,,; 80 P.3d 755, 80 P.3d 757.
In McCoy, we acknowledged that a related statute, AS 47.12.300(d), apparently required the pre- sentence investigator to obtain permission from the superior court before using these records.
Summary of this case from Hart v. StateIn McCoy, we concluded that Delinquency Rule 27(a)(1) — in particular, the phrase "court records of a juvenile delinquency proceeding" — encompassed the information in the juvenile probation officer's file, even when that information related to contacts that never led to formal delinquency proceedings.
Summary of this case from Hart v. StateFull title:Christopher J. McCOY, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.
Court:Court of Appeals of Alaska
Date published: Aug 30, 2002
OPINION DENYING REHEARING Christopher McCoy asks us to reconsider our decision in his appeal, McCoy v. State,…
Hart v. StateMANNHEIMER, Judge. Last year, in McCoy v. State, 59 P.3d 747, 750-751 (Alaska App. 2002), we were asked to…