From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCormick v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1067 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 19, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We affirm that portion of the judgment that decrees that plaintiffs are the owners of the beach area lying between the high bank on their property and the waters of Lake Erie. We modify the judgment, however, by vacating the second, third and fourth decretal paragraphs and by denying the motion and cross motion for summary judgment insofar as they seek a declaration of the easement rights of defendants over the beach area. Factual issues exist regarding the nature and scope of the easements granted in common to all owners of the subdivision.


Summaries of

McCormick v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1067 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

McCormick v. Long

Case Details

Full title:JAMES C. McCORMICK et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. LARRY E. LONG, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 1067 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 766

Citing Cases

Hopper v. Friery

Moreover, the fact that plaintiff's cottage may be more easily accessed through defendant's land does not…