From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCool v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Sep 14, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-00393 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-00393

09-14-2020

THOMAS MCCOOL, Plaintiff. v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On December 10, 2019, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison. See Dkt. 4. On August 20, 2020, Judge Edison filed a memorandum and recommendation (Dkt. 19) recommending that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14) be granted and the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 15) be denied.

No objections to the memorandum and recommendation have been filed. Accordingly, the court reviews the memorandum and recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, the court:

(1) approves and adopts Judge Edison's memorandum and recommendation (Dkt. 19) in its entirety as the holding of the court;

(2) grants the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14); and

(3) denies the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 15).

Signed on Galveston Island on this, the 14th day of September, 2020.

/s/_________

JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McCool v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Sep 14, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-00393 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2020)
Case details for

McCool v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MCCOOL, Plaintiff. v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 14, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-00393 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2020)

Citing Cases

Eldridge v. Kijakazi

, he was free to discount SAMC Herman's opinions relating to temperature, noise, and pulmonary irritants…

Chandler v. Kijakazi

, she was free to discount SAPC Tendler's opinion about occasional absences based on a lack of supporting…