From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClusky v. Gary Pools Sales and Serv., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 6, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and appellants' motions for summary judgment granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff was seriously injured when he slid down a slide head first into an above-ground swimming pool. Plaintiff, a 19-year-old experienced swimmer, was familiar with the pool and was aware that the water depth was 4 to 5 inches below the four-foot rim of the pool. These facts are materially indistinguishable from the facts in our recent decision in Kriz v Schum ( 145 A.D.2d 985). Special Term erred, therefore, in denying the motions of defendants Coleco Pools (Coleco) and Recreational Distributors Warehouse (RDW) Inc. for summary judgment. Further, neither Coleco nor RDW manufactured or sold the pool slide and there was no proof that either knew that a slide would be used with the pool. Therefore, there was no duty for either defendant to warn against using the slide to enter the pool (see, Denkensohn v Davenport, 144 A.D.2d 58).


Summaries of

McClusky v. Gary Pools Sales and Serv., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

McClusky v. Gary Pools Sales and Serv., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY McCLUSKY, Respondent, v. GARY POOLS SALES AND SERVICES, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)