From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClintoch v. Allen

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Jan 29, 1976
340 N.E.2d 899 (Mass. App. Ct. 1976)

Opinion

January 29, 1976.

Thomas M. Kiley for the plaintiffs.

Michael Wheeler ( George P. Lordan, Sr., with him) for the defendant.


The plaintiffs have appealed from an order for judgment entered after allowance of the defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute and after denial of the plaintiffs' motion for rehearing. Rule 41 (b) (2) of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure, 365 Mass. 804 (1974), provides: "On motion of the defendant, with notice, the court may, in its discretion, dismiss any action for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute . . ." (emphasis supplied). No abuse of that discretion has been demonstrated. The order for judgment is affirmed, and judgment is to be entered dismissing the action.

So ordered.


Summaries of

McClintoch v. Allen

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Jan 29, 1976
340 N.E.2d 899 (Mass. App. Ct. 1976)
Case details for

McClintoch v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM McCLINTOCH another vs. PARKER ALLEN

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Jan 29, 1976

Citations

340 N.E.2d 899 (Mass. App. Ct. 1976)
340 N.E.2d 899

Citing Cases

Wersetsky v. First Federal Sav. Loan Ass'n

After examination of the record on appeal, we conclude that the judge did not abuse his discretion in…

J G Constr. Co. v. Joseph E. Bennett Co.

The ultimate consequence of a dismissal for lack of prosecution is a judgment of dismissal which closes the…