From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCleskey v. Eason Constr.

United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana
Aug 23, 2022
1:21-cv-01250-JPH-DLP (S.D. Ind. Aug. 23, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01250-JPH-DLP

08-23-2022

MARK MCCLESKEY Trustee, INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, Plaintiffs, v. EASON CONSTRUCTION LLC a Missouri domestic limited liability company, Defendant.


ORDER ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge

In May 2021, Plaintiffs-Mark McCleskey and Indiana State Council of Plasterers and Cement Masons Health and Welfare and Pension Funds-filed a complaint against Defendant Eason Construction LLC, seeking damages for unpaid benefit contributions. Dkt. 1. Eason Construction has not responded or defended this case, and in July 2021, clerk's entry of default was entered against it. Dkt. 8. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for default judgment. Dkt. [14]. For the reasons that follow, that motion is GRANTED.

A. Liability

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 creates a two-step process for a party seeking default judgment. See VLM Food Trading Int'l, Inc. v. Illinois Trading Co., 811 F.3d 247, 255 (7th Cir. 2016). First, the plaintiff must obtain an entry of default from the Clerk. Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Upon default, the well-pleaded allegations in the complaint relating to liability are taken as true. VLM Food, 811 F.3d at 255. Second, after obtaining entry of default, the plaintiff may seek a default judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b).

Here, an entry of default was entered against Eason Construction, dkt. 8, and Plaintiffs seek default judgment. The allegations in the complaint, when taken as true, establish liability, so the Court must determine damages. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b).

B. Damages

While the Court must accept as true allegations relating to liability, "damages must be proved unless they are liquidated or capable of calculation." Wehrs v. Wells, 688 F.3d 886, 892 (7th Cir. 2012). A hearing is therefore required unless "the amount claimed is liquidated or capable of ascertainment from definite figures contained in the documentary evidence or in detailed affidavits." e360 Insight v. The Spamhaus Project, 500 F.3d 594, 602 (7th Cir. 2007)).

Here, Plaintiffs seek unpaid benefit contributions, liquidated damages, and audit costs. Dkt. 14 at 3. Their damages can be calculated from definite figures in Plaintiffs' evidence, so no hearing is necessary. See e360 Insight, 500 F.3d at 602.

1. Unpaid Benefit Contributions

Under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(A), the Court shall award unpaid contributions when entering judgment in favor of a plan. Plaintiffs request $46,064.36 in unpaid contributions. Dkt. 14 at 3. In support, they have provided an affidavit from Richard Wolf, whose firm completed the compliance audit of Eason Construction, explaining that the audit "found arrears . . . in the amount of $46,064.36 in benefits." Dkt. 14-2. Plaintiffs have also provided the audit report itemizing and totaling the unpaid contributions. Dkt. 14-3.

This uncontested affidavit and supporting exhibits are enough to support Plaintiffs' damages request. See e360 Insight, 500 F.3d at 602. They are therefore entitled to $46,064.36 in benefits.

2. Liquidated Damages

29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(C) provides for liquidated damages under the plan "not in excess of 20 percent (or such higher percentage as may be permitted under Federal or State law) of the amount" of unpaid contributions. Plaintiffs request $4,606.44 in liquidated damages. Dkt. 14 at 3. They have supported that request with the affidavit from Richard Wolf, dkt. 14-2, and the plan documents, dkt. 14-5 at 6-8 (liquidated damages provision).

Those supporting exhibits are enough to support Plaintiffs' liquidated damages request. See e360 Insight, 500 F.3d at 602. They are therefore entitled to $4,606.44 in liquidated damages.

3. Costs

Under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(D), the Court shall award "costs of the action, to be paid by the defendant. Plaintiffs request $1,992.50 in audit costs. Dkt. 14 at 3. In support, they have provided the affidavit from Richard Wolf explaining that his firm charged Plaintiffs "$1,992.50 for services to perform the audit." Dkt. 14-2. Plaintiffs are therefore entitled to recover those costs.

Conclusion

Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment is GRANTED. Dkt. [14]. They are entitled to unpaid benefit contributions, liquidated damages, and costs totaling $52,663.30. Final judgment shall issue by separate entry.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCleskey v. Eason Constr.

United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana
Aug 23, 2022
1:21-cv-01250-JPH-DLP (S.D. Ind. Aug. 23, 2022)
Case details for

McCleskey v. Eason Constr.

Case Details

Full title:MARK MCCLESKEY Trustee, INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana

Date published: Aug 23, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-01250-JPH-DLP (S.D. Ind. Aug. 23, 2022)

Citing Cases

McCleskey v. JMY Plastering Specialist LLC

The affidavit here is unsupported by any exhibits and does not explain how damages were calculated. Cf.…

Knowles v. Kingery & Sons Constr.

The affidavit here is unsupported by any exhibits and does not explain how damages were calculated. Cf.…