From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mcclellan v. Meyers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 2006
30 A.D.3d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8779.

June 13, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered June 6, 2005, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dinkes Schwitzer, New York (Souren A. Israelyan of counsel), for appellant.

Finkelstein Partners, Newburgh (James W. Shuttleworth, III of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ., Concur.


Plaintiff failed to demonstrate, in this legal malpractice action, that he would have been successful in the underlying negligence action but for the alleged negligence of his attorney ( Davis v. Klein, 88 NY2d 1008). In particular, he failed to raise a question of fact as to whether his injury was due to a defective condition, and whether the defendant in the underlying action had actual or constructive notice of such condition.


Summaries of

Mcclellan v. Meyers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 2006
30 A.D.3d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Mcclellan v. Meyers

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE McCLELLAN, Appellant, v. JACOBY MEYERS, L.L.P., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4776
815 N.Y.S.2d 825

Citing Cases

SIERATZKI v. SEI GLOBAL, INC.

It is well-settled that an action for legal malpractice requires proof that the attorney was negligent, that…

Aquino v. Kuczinski

We reverse. In order to establish a prima facie case of legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that…