Opinion
Argued March 6, 1922
Decided March 21, 1922
Frank E. Loughran for appellant.
Ira Skutch for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
McClaskey v. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 21, 1922
135 N.E. 914 (N.Y. 1922)
Summaries of
McClaskey v. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 21, 1922
135 N.E. 914 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for
McClaskey v. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Company
Case Details
Full title:GEORGE G. McCLASKEY, Respondent, v . CUMBERLAND GLASS MANUFACTURING…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 21, 1922
Citations
135 N.E. 914 (N.Y. 1922)
135 N.E. 914
Citing Cases
Zanger v. William S. Sussman, Incorporated
April 9, 1937. Order denying defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with ten dollars…
Sommer v. Ermold Co.In other words, the essential dispute on the record before us is whether the plaintiff's commissions were…