From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCaskill v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 21, 2022
1:21CV768 1:01CR350-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2022)

Opinion

1:21CV768 1:01CR350-1

03-21-2022

TOMMY TARRELL MCCASKILL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER

LORETTA C. BIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On January 24, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed, and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections, (ECF No. 289), within the time limit prescribed by § 636.

The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (ECF No. 287), which is affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's request for further relief under the First Step Act is DENIED and that this action is DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner promptly filing a corrected motion on the proper § 2255 forms if he seeks to attack his sentence under that statute. 1


Summaries of

McCaskill v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 21, 2022
1:21CV768 1:01CR350-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2022)
Case details for

McCaskill v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY TARRELL MCCASKILL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 21, 2022

Citations

1:21CV768 1:01CR350-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2022)