From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarthy v. Tedisco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 26, 1991
176 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 26, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Schenectady County (Doran, J.).


Since the time that plaintiff filed his notice of appeal, defendant James N. Tedisco has submitted an affidavit agreeing to change the symbol he uses in his campaign literature. Because this effectively grants plaintiff the relief he requested in the complaint, i.e., to enjoin Tedisco from using his current campaign symbol, this appeal has been rendered moot (see, Matter of Herald Co. v. O'Brien, 149 A.D.2d 781, 782; Matter of Beyah v LeFevre, 142 A.D.2d 829).

Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Weiss and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

McCarthy v. Tedisco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 26, 1991
176 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

McCarthy v. Tedisco

Case Details

Full title:GARY R. McCARTHY, Appellant, v. JAMES N. TEDISCO et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 26, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Tottey v. Bush

In proceeding No. 1, petitioner alleged that the Town lacked the authority to terminate him. Supreme Court…