From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarthy v. Sosnick

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Nov 23, 2011
490 Mich. 918 (Mich. 2011)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 142461 142462.COA Nos. 300159 300160.

2011-11-23

Patrick McCARTHY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Edward SOSNICK, Wendy L. Potts, Kevin M. Oeffner, Richard M. Lynch, Jeanne Stempien, Kathleen J. McCann, Thomas J. Ryan, Barry M. Grant, Michael J. Talbot, Diane M. Garrison, Nancy J. Diehl, Ronald F. Rose, Nancy J. Grant, and Oakland County Circuit Court, Defendants–Appellees.


Prior report: 489 Mich. 900, 796 N.W.2d 254.

Order

On order of the Court, the motions for reconsideration of this Court's April 25, 2011 order are considered, and they are DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. The motion for clarification is also DENIED. On the Court's own motion, we conclude that the motions filed by plaintiff-appellant Patrick McCarthy on May 13, 2011 are frivolous and vexatious. MCR 7.316(D). Mr. McCarthy is ordered to pay the Clerk of this Court $500 within 28 days of the date of this order. We direct the Clerk of this Court not to accept any further filings from Mr. McCarthy in any non-criminal matter until he has made the payment required by this order.


Summaries of

McCarthy v. Sosnick

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Nov 23, 2011
490 Mich. 918 (Mich. 2011)
Case details for

McCarthy v. Sosnick

Case Details

Full title:Patrick McCARTHY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Edward SOSNICK, Wendy L. Potts…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

490 Mich. 918 (Mich. 2011)
805 N.W.2d 436

Citing Cases

Manley v. Manley

Here, the trial court found that defendant's motion was frivolous because it was essentially the same motion…