From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarthy v. Clark Cnty.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Nov 2, 2016
186 Wn. 2d 1018 (Wash. 2016)

Opinion

No. 93280–8

11-02-2016

Fearghal McCarthy, et al., Petitioners, v. Clark County, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

¶1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Johnson, Fairhurst, Wiggins, and Gordon McCloud, considered at its November 1, 2016, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That both Petitions for Review are denied. The City of Vancouver's Motion to Strike Appendix C to the petition for review filed by C.P.M. and C.C.M. is granted. The Respondents' joint motion to strike portions of C.P.M. and C.C.M.'s reply to the answer to the petition for review is also granted.

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

McCarthy v. Clark Cnty.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Nov 2, 2016
186 Wn. 2d 1018 (Wash. 2016)
Case details for

McCarthy v. Clark Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Fearghal McCarthy, et al., Petitioners, v. Clark County, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Nov 2, 2016

Citations

186 Wn. 2d 1018 (Wash. 2016)
186 Wash. 2d 1018
383 P.3d 1023

Citing Cases

Hicks v. Klickitat Cnty. Sheriff's Office

Our Supreme Court denied review. McCarthy v. Clark County , 186 Wash.2d 1018, 383 P.3d 1023 (2016). ¶26 Here,…