From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarthy Const. Co. v. Southern Detectives

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 22, 1971
186 S.E.2d 895 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

46645.

ARGUED OCTOBER 6, 1971.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 22, 1971. REHEARING DENIED DECEMBER 14, 1971.

Action on account. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Fryer.

Peek, Whaley Haldi, J. Corbett Peek, Jr., R. Joseph Costanzo, Jr., for appellant.


The appellee filed a claim on an open account against the appellant which was tried in the Civil Court of Fulton County without the intervention of a jury. The appellee received a verdict and the appellant appealed.

The appellant's main contention is that certain business records of the appellee should not have been admitted in evidence because the test for the admission of records made in the regular course of business as prescribed by Code Ann. § 38-711 (Ga. L. 1952, p. 177) had not been met. The appellant argues that because the witness did not have personal knowledge of the correctness of the records they should not have been admitted. This court held to the contrary in Dowling v. Jones-Logan Co., 123 Ga. App. 380 (3) ( 181 S.E.2d 75): "As to the ground that there was no personal knowledge of the records, this contention was decided adversely to the defendant's contention in Allstate Ins. Co. v. Buck, 96 Ga. App. 376 ( 100 S.E.2d 142). See Ferguson v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc., 93 Ga. App. 622 (4) ( 92 S.E.2d 321); Robinson v. Reward Ceramic c. Mfg., 120 Ga. App. 380, 384 ( 170 S.E.2d 724). See also discussion in 32 CJS 902, Evidence, § 682 (3). The purpose of Code Ann. § 38-711 is to allow the determination of records without the necessity of producing all the various clerical personnel who made the entries. See Green, Ga. Law of Evidence, p. 624, § 315: 32 CJS 902, Evidence, § 682 (3); 30 AmJur2d 49, Evidence, § 930. We also point out that since this case was tried without a jury, the trial judge has a much broader discretion in the admission of evidence since it is presumed that in his consideration of the evidence he sifted the wheat from the chaff and selected the legal testimony. Thus, his judgment will not be reversed where there is any legal evidence to support the finding. McElroy v. Williams Bros. Motors, 104 Ga. App. 435, 437 ( 121 S.E.2d 917). See Nelliger v. Atlanta Baggage c. Co., 109 Ga. App. 863, 866 ( 137 S.E.2d 566); Bailey v. Holmes. 163 Ga. 272 ( 136 S.E. 60)."

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed. Jordan, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

ARGUED OCTOBER 6, 1971 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 22, 1971 — REHEARING DENIED DECEMBER 14, 1971.


Summaries of

McCarthy Const. Co. v. Southern Detectives

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 22, 1971
186 S.E.2d 895 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

McCarthy Const. Co. v. Southern Detectives

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY McCARTHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. SOUTHERN DETECTIVES, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 22, 1971

Citations

186 S.E.2d 895 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
186 S.E.2d 895

Citing Cases

Williams v. Davis Water c. Industries

"This section shall be liberally interpreted and applied." Code § 38-711, and see McCarthy Const. Co. v.…

Welborn v. State

4. It is not necessary that a witness identifying business records under Code Ann. § 38-711 have personal…