From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCants v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 22, 2003
305 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92676

May 22, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review two determinations of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Andre McCants, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was the subject of two misbehavior reports. The first charged him with refusing to obey a direct order based upon his failure to comply with a correction officer's directive to pack up his property in preparation for being transported to a court appearance. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented at his disciplinary hearing in the form of the misbehavior report, prepared by the officer who issued the orders, and the concessions of guilt made by petitioner in the course of his hearing testimony (see Matter of Jackson v. Portuondo, 243 A.D.2d 805). Petitioner's assertions that his refusal was justified because there was nothing left in the cell for him to pack raised an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Austin v. Goord, 295 A.D.2d 662).

In the second misbehavior report, petitioner was charged with refusing to obey a direct order, interference with a facility employee and harassment after he refused repeated orders to secure the door to his recreation pen and used a profanity to the correction officer who issued the orders. Petitioner pleaded guilty to the first two charges and was found guilty, following a hearing, of the charge of harassment based upon substantial evidence in the form of the detailed misbehavior report (see Matter of Oyekoya v. Duncan, 284 A.D.2d 757, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 601). Petitioner's assertion that he was denied a fair hearing by various procedural errors has been reviewed and found to be meritless.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determinations are confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

McCants v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 22, 2003
305 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

McCants v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ANDRE McCANTS, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, AS DIRECTOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 22, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 865