From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCanliss v. McCanliss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

May, 1928.


Order modified by requiring that plaintiff include in the bill of particulars a specification whether the alleged representations were affirmatively made by defendant or whether plaintiff intends to rely upon a failure of defendant to disclose facts known to defendant and unknown to him; and also by requiring plaintiff to specify whether defendant's alleged representations were oral or written, and, if the latter, that plaintiff furnish defendant a copy thereof. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCanliss v. McCanliss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

McCanliss v. McCanliss

Case Details

Full title:LEE McCANLISS, Respondent, v. IRENE McCANLISS, Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1928

Citations

224 App. Div. 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Mook v. Mook

This rule limiting examinations before trial in matrimonial actions is not so strictly applied in actions to…

Immerman v. Immerman

We have repeatedly stated that such an examination should not be permitted. It is undoubtedly true that, in…