From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCanick v. W.J.A. Realty Ltd. Partnership

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 22, 1987
516 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 87-371.

December 22, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, John Gale, J.

Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellants.

High, Stack, Lazenby Palahach and Donn S. Dutton, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


Rosie McCanick, a patron at the defendant-appellee's Jai-Alai Fronton, tripped over an abrasive strip which had become partially detached from the floor. We reverse the directed verdict granted the defendant at the end of the plaintiffs' case because evidence that the glue used to install the strip would not, if correctly employed, have come loose before the strip itself wore out, created a triable issue as to whether the defendants were actively negligent in making the installation improperly. Arnold v. Miami Beach Kennel Club, Inc., 88 So.2d 617 (Fla. 1956); Carls Markets, Inc. v. Meyer, 69 So.2d 789 (Fla. 1953); First Fed. Sav. Loan Ass'n v. Wylie, 46 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1950); Fritts v. Collins, 144 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); 41 Fla. Jur.2d Premises Liability § 21 (1983). The cause is therefore remanded for a new trial.

Because of our conclusion that a jury question exists as to active negligence, it is unnecessary, see Carls Markets, 69 So.2d at 789, to consider the plaintiff's alternative argument that the fronton was on constructive notice of the defect merely because over three hours elapsed between its last inspection of the area and the accident. We do observe, however, that although there is some indication to the contrary, see Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Williams, 264 So.2d 862, 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972), the fact that there is no inspection for a given length of time in itself provides no proof that the defect was actually there for a sufficient period to place the landowner on reasonable notice of its existence. In this case, for example, there is no showing that the defect did not come into observable existence immediately before or at the time of the accident, so that the absence of any previous inspection would have made no difference.

Reversed.


Summaries of

McCanick v. W.J.A. Realty Ltd. Partnership

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 22, 1987
516 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

McCanick v. W.J.A. Realty Ltd. Partnership

Case Details

Full title:ROSIE LEE McCANICK AND LUTHER McCANICK, APPELLANTS, v. W.J.A. REALTY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 22, 1987

Citations

516 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. King

However, the courts have held the fact there was no inspection for a given length of time in itself provides…

Vazquez v. Target Corp.

” Barbour, 801 So.2d at 957 (citing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. King, 592 So.2d 705, 707 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)).…