From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCaffery v. 924 Food Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 2002
295 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1323, 1324, 1325

June 11, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered June 22, 2001, as amended to reflect defendants' correct address, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about June 15, 1998, and an order, same court and Justice, denominated an "amended judgment," entered June 22, 2001, granting plaintiff's motion to amend the judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeals from orders entered on or about June 15, 1998 and entered on June 22, 2001, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed within the appeal from the judgment as amended.

MICHAEL A. CALANO, for Plaintiffs-Defendents.

MAX W. GERSHWEIR, for Appellants.

Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Sullivan, Marlow, JJ.


Contrary to appellant Tower Insurance Company's argument, the award of summary judgment in Tower's favor in the previously concluded Insurance Law § 3420 action by plaintiffs against Tower was not preclusive of the amendment sought by plaintiffs in the judgment obtained by them in the underlying personal injury action. The court in the Insurance Law action did not, and had no need to, determine that defendants and their premises were not in fact insured by Tower, only that the judgment in the underlying personal injury action, as it then read, was not against Tower's insureds and thus was not a proper predicate for plaintiff's Insurance Law § 3420 action. Inasmuch as it is clear from the record that the defect in judgment was solely attributable to an inadvertent notational error and did not result from or represent the adjudication of a matter of substance, it was precisely the type of "mistake, defect or irregularity in the papers or procedures in the action" the correction of which was properly accomplished pursuant to CPLR 5019(a) (see, Herpe v. Herpe, 225 N.Y. 323; cf., Pjetri v. New York City Health Hosp. Corp., 169 A.D.2d 100, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 615).

We have considered Tower's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

McCaffery v. 924 Food Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 2002
295 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

McCaffery v. 924 Food Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS McCAFFERY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. 924 FOOD CORP., ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 11, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
743 N.Y.S.2d 453

Citing Cases

Los v. Diomaris C.

Family Court correctly denied petitioner's objections to the Support Magistrate's sua sponte amendment of the…