From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McBride v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 10, 1923
95 So. 920 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)

Opinion

8 Div. 967.

April 10, 1923.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W.W. Haralson, Judge.

Harvey McBride was convicted of manufacturing whisky. and he appeals. Affirmed.

Proctor Snodgrass, of Scottsboro, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.


Defendant was convicted of manufacturing whisky, and, from the judgment overruling his motion for new trial, he appeals.

The bill of exceptions fails to state that it contains all of the evidence, and, in the absence of this statement, we must presume there was other and sufficient evidence to support the verdict. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

McBride v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 10, 1923
95 So. 920 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)
Case details for

McBride v. State

Case Details

Full title:McBRIDE v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 10, 1923

Citations

95 So. 920 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)
19 Ala. App. 196

Citing Cases

Franks v. State

Hence any state of evidence will be presumed to uphold the rulings as to evidence on charges requested. Terry…