From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McBride v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 21, 1993
617 So. 2d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-1435.

April 21, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Robert B. Carney, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Melvina Racey Flaherty, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence except for the order of restitution to the victim which we reverse. The defendant was found not guilty of the theft of the VCR for which restitution was ordered. Therefore, restitution for its loss is improper. See Simmons v. State, 484 So.2d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Furthermore, the trial court's oral sentence did not include a requirement of restitution although the written sentence did. However, the written order must conform to the oral pronouncement. Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for entry of order vacating order of restitution.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McBride v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 21, 1993
617 So. 2d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

McBride v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES McBRIDE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 21, 1993

Citations

617 So. 2d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Weiss v. State

As such, we remand with directions for the trial court to enter a written order conforming to its oral…

Seymore v. State

We do agree, as pointed out by appellant's counsel, that the restitution order of $260 should be stricken…