From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McAlice v. Safeco Life Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Dec 1, 1999
741 A.2d 264 (R.I. 1999)

Opinion

97-356-A.

December 1, 1999

Appeal from Superior Court, Providence County, Goldberg, J.

Stephen C. Mackie, Providence, for Plaintiff.

Thomas R. Bender, A. Lauriston Parks, Providence, for Defendant.

Present: WEISBERGER, C.J., LEDERBERG, BOURCIER and FLANDERS, JJ.


OPINION


This case came before us on appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court in favor of the defendant, Safeco Life Insurance Company. The trial justice, sitting without the intervention of a jury, held that the defendant was not liable to the plaintiffs, Henry B. and Elaine McAlice, for the tortious acts of Louis Thacker, a financial planner who had a contractual relationship with the defendant to sell its investment products. The trial justice found that Thacker was not the defendant's agent and, therefore, the defendant was not vicariously liable for Thacker's conversion of the plaintiffs' investment money entrusted to him. Since this Court is evenly divided on the issues raised by this appeal, the judgment of the Superior Court is hereby affirmed.

The papers in this case may be remanded to the Superior Court.

Justice Goldberg did not participate.


Summaries of

McAlice v. Safeco Life Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Dec 1, 1999
741 A.2d 264 (R.I. 1999)
Case details for

McAlice v. Safeco Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:HENRY B. McALICE ET AL v. SAFECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Dec 1, 1999

Citations

741 A.2d 264 (R.I. 1999)

Citing Cases

Toledo v. Van Waters Rogers, Inc.

In contrast, an independent contractor relationship exists where one is retained to perform a task…

Rose Enterprises v. Willis, 01-519 (2004)

As such, our Supreme Court has clearly stated an independent contractor is retained to perform a task…