From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 9, 1993
614 So. 2d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-779.

February 9, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Steven B. Robinson, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Julie M. Levitt, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


After leaving an afternoon football game, M.C. and friends came upon a railroad crossing arm device that had been tampered with so that it was stuck in the "down" position blocking traffic. No evidence was presented that M.C. caused the signal to malfunction.

The juvenile lifted the arm for each vehicle crossing the railroad tracks while his companions asked the motorists for a quarter each in compensation for the service. The State charged M.C. with violating section 860.08, Florida Statutes (1991), which provides:

Any person . . . who knowingly or willfully interferes with . . . any railroad signal system used to control railroad operations . . . or other signal used in connection with railroad operations is guilty of a felony of the third degree.

We agree with M.C. that both the plain and ordinary meaning of the word "interfere", and the principle of lenity favoring defendants in criminal cases, see Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1987); § 775.021(1), Fla. Stat. (1991), militate against the adjudication of delinquency on the facts of this case. "Interfere" means "[t]o come between so as to be a hindrance or obstacle; impede." American Heritage Dictionary 669 (2d college ed. 1985). Where, as here, the device was already nonfunctioning and obstructing the flow of traffic, the juvenile's conduct in manually assisting the device's ordinary function was not an interference.

Reversed.


Summaries of

M.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 9, 1993
614 So. 2d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

M.C. v. State

Case Details

Full title:M.C., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 9, 1993

Citations

614 So. 2d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

O.P-G. v. State

In construing another penal statute, we have already determined that the plain and ordinary meaning of the…

M.C. v. State

In construing another penal statute, we have already determined that the plain and ordinary meaning of the…