From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayzone v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 9, 2017
NO. 03-17-00300-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 03-17-00300-CR

11-09-2017

Joseph Paul Mayzone, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 93-069-K277 , HONORABLE STACEY MATHEWS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Joseph Paul Mayzone, appearing pro se, seeks to appeal from the trial court's denial of his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. In criminal cases, unless expressly authorized by statute, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review final judgments. Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (standard for determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded by law but whether appeal is authorized by law). In criminal cases, an appeal is authorized only when a trial court "enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02 ("A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescribed . . . ."). A post-judgment order denying a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order. See Abbott, 271 S.W.3d at 697 (holding that no rule or statutory or constitutional provision authorizes appeal of post-judgment order denying time-credit motion); Suarez v. State, 03-14-00477-CR, 2014 WL 4915211, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Sept. 25, 2014, pet. ref'd, untimely filed) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (holding no appellate jurisdiction over denial of motion for judgment nunc pro tunc); Deshotel v. State, No. 14-13-01093-CR, 2014 WL 51438, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 7, 2014, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (no appellate jurisdiction over denial of motion for judgment nunc pro tunc seeking to modify offense stated in judgment based on alleged agreement). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

/s/_________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: November 9, 2017 Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Mayzone v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 9, 2017
NO. 03-17-00300-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Mayzone v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Paul Mayzone, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Nov 9, 2017

Citations

NO. 03-17-00300-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2017)