From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayzell v. Quarles Brady

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 22, 1999
744 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-3672.

Opinion filed September 22, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Catherine M. Brunson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CL 97-7329 AH.

Robert R. Adler of Delmer C. Gowing III, P.A., Delray Beach, for appellant.

Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham Ford, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a final judgment in favor of appellee. We affirm.

The parties agree that the trial court erred in striking as untimely the affidavits filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. How the error occurred is unexplained in light of the plain language of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c) which permits delivery of such opposing affidavits prior to 5:00 p.m. two business days prior to hearing on the motion.

Unlike Goldstein v. Wortmann, 712 So.2d 397 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), however, appellee in this case has presented the argument that notwithstanding the trial court's erroneously striking the affidavits, the error was harmless. We agree.

POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mayzell v. Quarles Brady

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 22, 1999
744 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Mayzell v. Quarles Brady

Case Details

Full title:GERALD MAYZELL, Appellant, v. QUARLES BRADY, a general partnership…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 22, 1999

Citations

744 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)