From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mays v. California

U.S.
Jun 17, 1963
374 U.S. 490 (1963)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 871, Misc.

Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: See 205 Cal.App.2d 798, 23 Cal.Rptr. 605.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.


Summaries of

Mays v. California

U.S.
Jun 17, 1963
374 U.S. 490 (1963)
Case details for

Mays v. California

Case Details

Full title:MAYS v . CALIFORNIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 17, 1963

Citations

374 U.S. 490 (1963)

Citing Cases

People v. Mays

We then concluded that such appointment would be neither advantageous to appellant nor helpful to this court.…