From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayfield v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Apr 13, 2020
No. 17-cv-0891 MV/SMV (D.N.M. Apr. 13, 2020)

Opinion

No. 17-cv-0891 MV/SMV

04-13-2020

EARL R. MAYFIELD, Petitioner, v. GREG MORRIS, TOM RUIZ, and STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Respondents.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition ("PF&RD"), filed February 28, 2020. [Doc. 32]. On reference by the undersigned, the Honorable Stephan M. Vidmar, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended denying Petitioner's Fourth Amended Petition Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. 21], which was filed by his attorney. At the request of Petitioner, Judge Vidmar granted extra time, until April 10, 2020, to object to the PF&RD. [Doc. 36]. Nevertheless, no party objected.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition [Doc. 21] are ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Fourth Amended Petition Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. 21] is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

MARTHA VÁZQUEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mayfield v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Apr 13, 2020
No. 17-cv-0891 MV/SMV (D.N.M. Apr. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Mayfield v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:EARL R. MAYFIELD, Petitioner, v. GREG MORRIS, TOM RUIZ, and STATE OF NEW…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Apr 13, 2020

Citations

No. 17-cv-0891 MV/SMV (D.N.M. Apr. 13, 2020)

Citing Cases

Urban v. West Virginia

To the contrary, the Supreme Court of the United States held that entrapment has no constitutional…