From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayer v. Mayer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 2002
291 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-11303

Submitted January 10, 2002.

February 6, 2002.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Williams, J.H.O.), entered November 3, 2000, as (1) directed him to pay the defendant wife $3,900 per month in child support, (2) directed him to pay 100% of the children's unreimbursed medical, pharmaceutical, optical, dental, orthodontic, therapeutic, and care expenses, and (3) directed him to pay to the defendant wife the principal sum of $23,009.74 in arrears in maintenance and child support.

Silver, Forrester, Schisano, Lesser Tamsen, P.C., New Windsor, N.Y. (Darryl J. Dreyer and Sarah Rosenblatt Dreyer of counsel), for appellant.

Sheila Callahan O'Donnell, Cornwall, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, LEO F. McGINITY, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly awarded child support pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 240(1-b)(k). The plaintiff presented insufficient evidence to determine his gross income and, as a result, the Supreme Court properly awarded child support based on the "needs" and "standard of living" of the children (Kay v. Kay, 37 N.Y.2d 632, 636; Domestic Relations Law § 240[1-b][k]). For the same reason, the Supreme Court properly directed the plaintiff to pay 100% of the children's unreimbursed medical, pharmaceutical, optical, dental, orthodontic, therapeutic, and care expenses.

Based on the meticulous records kept by the defendant of the payments she made on behalf of herself and the children during the pendency of this action, and the corresponding lack of any records kept by the plaintiff, the Supreme Court properly awarded the defendant the full requested amount of retroactive arrears.

FLORIO, J.P., SMITH, McGINITY and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mayer v. Mayer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 2002
291 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Mayer v. Mayer

Case Details

Full title:PAUL S. MAYER, appellant, v. COLLEEN F. MAYER, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 6, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 887

Citing Cases

IN RE A PROCEEDING UNDER ART. 6 OF FAMILY CT. ACT

The petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the paid receipt for A.'s second semester tuition, room and…

Lew v. Lew

The plaintiff failed to comply with the requirement that he file a statement of net worth ( see Domestic…