From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mauro v. Mauro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2004
13 A.D.3d 345 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2004-00698.

December 6, 2004.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 2, 1991, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Spolzino, J.), entered December 18, 2003, which denied his motion to vacate the judgment of divorce entered upon his failure to appear or answer.

Before: Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Smith, Cozier and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant admits that he had notice of the judgment of divorce three years before he made the motion to vacate. Accordingly, that branch of the defendant's motion which was to vacate the judgment of divorce and to reopen the issue of equitable distribution on the ground of excusable neglect under CPLR 5015 (a) (1) was properly denied as untimely ( see Hartcorn v. Hartcorn, 299 AD2d 395; Nahmani v. Town of Ramapo, 262 AD2d 291; Cook v. Cook, 260 AD2d 160; Matter of Brittany J., 235 AD2d 310).

Furthermore, that branch of the defendant's motion which was to vacate the judgment of divorce for lack of personal jurisdiction ( see CPLR 5015 [a] [4]) was properly denied. The affidavit of service attached to the summons with notice was prima facie proof of proper service pursuant to CPLR 308 (1), and the defendant failed to dispute the facts alleged in the affidavit ( see Olesniewicz v. Khan, 8 AD3d 354; Hanover Ins. Co. v. Cannon Express Corp., 1 AD3d 358; 96 Pierrepont, LLC v. Mauro, 304 AD2d 631).


Summaries of

Mauro v. Mauro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2004
13 A.D.3d 345 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Mauro v. Mauro

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES MAURO, Respondent, v. ALBERT MAURO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 345 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
786 N.Y.S.2d 213

Citing Cases

Wunsch v. Cerwinski

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the untimely motion ( see CPLR 5015 [a]) of the defendant…

Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSP v. Petion

It is well-established that a process server's sworn affidavit of service constitutes prima facie evidence of…