From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maupin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District
May 10, 1976
536 S.W.2d 507 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 10164.

April 21, 1976. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 10, 1976.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, GREENE COUNTY, JAMES H. KEET, JR., J.

Scott B. Tinsley, Springfield, for movant-appellant.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Preston Dean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


Appellant Maupin has appealed from a denial of his Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., motion to vacate judgment and sentence.

This appeal is a companion case to Gibson v. State, decided this date, and since the appellant has pending in this Court a direct appeal from the conviction he seeks to attack under Rule 27.26 he cannot invoke post-conviction remedies until his appeal is determined. Rule 27.26(b), (2).

For the reasons set forth in Gibson v. State, the state's motion to dismiss this appeal is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

All concur.


Summaries of

Maupin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District
May 10, 1976
536 S.W.2d 507 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Maupin v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANK W. MAUPIN, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District

Date published: May 10, 1976

Citations

536 S.W.2d 507 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

State v. Meeks

By resentencing appellant, his appeal or potential appeal was pending and any additional allegations under…

Faught v. State

Rule 27.26(b)(2) provides: "A motion to vacate, set aside or correct a sentence cannot be maintained while an…