From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maultsby v. Maultsby

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 20, 1959
109 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

Opinion

No. 799.

January 30, 1959. Rehearing Denied February 20, 1959.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Roger A. Barker, J.

Sam E. Murrell Sons, Orlando, for appellant.

Roth Roth, Orlando, for appellee.


Appellant primarily questions the alimony award. It is not made to appear that there has been an abuse of judicial discretion. If it should develop that the alimony award imposes a hardship upon the appellant, then he has his remedy, under appropriate circumstances, for reduction as provided under section 65.15, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. See also Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App. 1958, 104 So.2d 597. No error has been made to appear. The cause is accordingly affirmed

Affirmed.

KANNER, C.J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maultsby v. Maultsby

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 20, 1959
109 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)
Case details for

Maultsby v. Maultsby

Case Details

Full title:LEIGHLER C. MAULTSBY, APPELLANT, v. SUE M. MAULTSBY, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 20, 1959

Citations

109 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)